GMB North West & Irish Region
30 August 2013

Time to expose UKIP MEPs for what they really are – lazy & unprincipled

by Rebecca  Taylor,  Liberal  Democrat  Member  of  the European Parliament and Petros Fassoulas, Chairman of the European Movement UK

UKIP  MEPs  are  infamous  for  being not just Britain's laziest  members  of  the European Parliament, but among the laziest in Europe, as figures from VoteWatch and EP Committee minutes have shown (and the Mirror graphically exposed recently).

 

UKIP  MEPs’ excuse for their lack of graft is that their job  is  to get the UK out of the EU and they don't need to bother with anything else, like actually representing their constituents’ interests in Brussels.

 

Of  course  if  they were politicians of principle, they could refuse to take their seats after elected. But then they  would  forfeit  their  MEP  salary and allowances, which  they  don't  seem keen to do. In fact UKIP are on record  as  boasting  about  how  much  money their MEPs claim, for not doing their jobs properly. This not being enough,  two UKIP MEPs were jailed for expense fraud and benefit  fraud  and last year two further UKIP MEPs were forced  to  repay nearly £40k to the European Parliament after being found to have used allowances improperly.

 

In  addition,  UKIP  MEPs  are far less transparent than MEPs  from  other UK parties, who publish their expenses on  their  websites  and  regularly update them (Rebecca Taylor’s can be found here).

 

Mr  Farage was caught out by the BBC's Andrew Neil, when he  was  asked  why he and his deputy Mr Nuttall had not published  their  expenses for 2 years despite promising to do so. Mr Farage was unable to produce a convincing response,  saying  instead  that  he was "very busy" and that he had "lost some receipts".

 

But what does Nigel Farage does while he is in Brussels, paid by British tax payers? Does he stand up for British interests? Does he work on legislation that will improve the  life  of  his  constituents?  No, of course not, he spends  his time avoiding committee meetings and failing to  vote  even  on issues that are important for the UK. European  Liberal  group leader Guy Verhofstadt famously accused  Nigel Farage of being the EU's biggest waste of money.  He  has  a point. Mr Farage has failed to attend 48%  of Plenary votes, has never drafted a report and he is joint bottom when it comes to Parliamentary questions asked.

 

As  the  Common  Fisheries Policy (CFP) is important for the  fishing  industry in the South East of England, the region  Mr  Farage  represents,  he has tried to make it look like he was doing something by "campaigning", which seemed   to  be  limited  to  sending  out  angry  press releases. However, he has never bothered to take part in Fisheries    Committee   meetings   and   when   mammoth cross-party  efforts by centre-right, Socialist, Liberal and  Green  MEPs  ensured an historic reform of the CFP, which  will  end overfishing and safeguard the future of the fishing industry in Europe, Mr Farage was nowhere to be  found.  He  did  not  even  bother to show up to the fisheries  committee  final  vote (which was very close) and he disappeared halfway through the plenary vote.

 

In  fact,  according  to  Committee minutes, he attended just  one  of  42  Fisheries  Committee meetings between February  2010  and  January 2013, when he resigned from all  Committees. Which is consistent with UKIP's record; UKIP MEPs have attended just 30% of Committee meetings.

 

Which  is a real shame and huge waste. The real graft in Brussels  is done in committee, so by skipping committee meetings UKIP miss the chance to exert any influence and help  shape  laws  that  affect their constituents. They claim  that  there is no point as they would be outvoted every  time, which is patently ridiculous when key votes can  (and  often  do)  go one way or another with only a vote to spare.

 

Committee   work  requires  an  MEP  to  understand  the proposal   in  question,  meet  with  businesses,  NGOs, pressure   groups,   ordinary  citizens,  trade  unions, national  government  representatives etc. to hear their positions,  develop  amendments  that  will  not only be workable,  but  will  also  get  sufficient support from their  political  group  as well as other MEPs, and keep track  of  the  hundreds,  sometimes  thousands of other amendments.  Doing  all  this  properly is hard work and very  time  consuming,  so no wonder UKIP MEPs prefer to prance  round  the UK making speeches to their followers and  sending  out  angry  press  releases  instead. Much easier!

 

UKIP's  deputy  leader  Paul  Nuttall  MEP is a point in case.  He  is a Member of the Environment, Public Health and Food Safety Committee, but in nearly three years had attended  only  twice. According to figures by VoteWatch he  is  736th (out of 753 MEPs) when it comes to Plenary sessions  attended.  He is joint bottom both for reports and  opinions  drafted  (actually  he  hasn’t  drafted a single one!).

 

This  is  again  “out  of principle”; he thinks his time would  be  better  used  elsewhere.  Or he does until he realises  he  might  get  some bad publicity as happened recently.

 

The Environment, Public Health and Food Safety Committee recently  debated and voted on the EU tobacco directive, which   included   the   regulation   of   e-cigarettes. Like-minded  MEPs  from  several parties worked to table sensible  amendments  on e-cigarettes and it all came to head in the Committee vote.

 

Knowing  that the key amendment on e-cigarettes required all  the  votes  it  could get and that Mr Nuttall never attends committee, e-cigarettes users (some of whom were Mr  Nuttall’s  constituents)  were encouraged to contact his  office.  Some  were ignored, some received the same generic e-mail response they had received several months previously,  and  at least one was told Mr Nuttall would not attend the tobacco directive vote.

 

They  were  dismayed  and began complaining about him on Twitter.  Then  all  of  a sudden Mr Nuttall changed his mind  and  showed  up  at the Committee meeting (his 3rd visit in 3 years!), although he didn't bother to vote on many amendments.

 

This  experience was a great opportunity for many voters to  realise  that  while UKIP shout loudly, they do very little  else. Many of them expressed surprise; UKIP like to  portray  themselves  as  standing  up  for "ordinary British  people";  what  they  actually do is ignore the very people they claim to represent.

 

Needless  to  say,  Mr  Nuttall's constituents were left unimpressed,  but at least they were able to compare the efforts  to  shape  EU  laws made by hard working LibDem MEPs  (among others) with the "blink-and-you'll-miss-it" work done by UKIP MEPs.

 

Mr  Nuttall’s  attitude  shows that UKIP MEPs are indeed lazy,  exactly because they think they can get away with it.  They  claim  to  be  avoiding  the  hard  graft  of parliamentary committee work out of principle, but those principles  are  soon  chucked  by  the  wayside if they suspect they will get any bad publicity.

 

Put under a little scrutiny, especially by UK voters who are vocal, active on social media and in regular contact with broadcast media, and suddenly UKIP MEPs decide that attending  EP  Committees  is  not  such a waste of time after all.

 

Time for a lot more scrutiny of UKIP!

 

The European Movement UK is Britain’s longest standing pro-European organization, campaigning for decades to inform the debate around the benefits of EU membership.

 

We are a not-for-profit, non-governmental organization, funded exclusively by our members. Visit

www.euromove.org.uk to see how you can join us and help

keep Britain in the EU.

www.euromove.org.uk

@euromove